Dear Applied Statistics Workshop,
Please join us this Wednesday, December 10th, when Amanda Cox (who is with
the New York Times) when she will present "Open Problems in NYT Graphics".
Amanda provided the following abstract:
The New York Times graphics department is a group of about 30 journalists
who make the charts, maps and diagrams for the print and online versions of
the paper. This talk is a (completely unofficial) guide to some of the
problems the department faces on an ongoing basis, including how to
represent uncertainty in an accessible way, and how to move beyond something
I call "Here is some data:" toward something closer to inference.
The applied statistics workshop meets at 12 noon in room K-354, CGIS-Knafel
(1737 Cambridge St) with a light lunch. Presentations start at 1215 pm and
usually end around 130 pm. As always, all are welcome and please email me
with any questions.
Cheers
Justin Grimmer
Dear Applied Statistics Community,
Please join us this Wednesday, December 3rd when Michael Peress, Department
of Political Science, University of Rochester, will be presenting,
"Estimating Proposal and Status Quo Locations Using Voting and Cosponsorship
Data". Michael provided the following abstract,
Theories of lawmaking generate predictions for the policy outcome as a
function of the
status quo. These theories are difficult to test because existing ideal
point estimation techniques
do not recover the locations of proposals or status quos. Instead, such
techniques only recover
cutpoints. This limitation has meant that existing tests of theories of
lawmaking have been
indirect in nature. I propose a method of directly measuring ideal points,
proposal locations, and
status quo locations on the same multidimensional scale, by employing a
combination of voting
data, bill and amendment cosponsorship data, and the congressional record.
My approach works
as follows. First, we can identify the locations of legislative proposals
(bills and amendments) on
the same scale as voter ideal points by jointly scaling voting and
cosponsorship data. Next, we
can identify the location of the final form of the bill using the location
of last successful
amendment (which we already know). If the bill was not amended, then the
final form is simply
the original bill location. Finally, we can identify the status quo point by
employing the cutpoint
we get from scaling the final passage vote. To implement this procedure, I
automatically coded
data on the congressional record available from www.thomas.gov. I apply this
approach to recent
sessions of the U.S. Senate, and use it to test the implications of
competing theories of
lawmaking.
A copy of the paper is available here:
http://people.fas.harvard.edu/~jgrimmer/StatusQuos.pdf
The applied statistics workshop meets at 12 noon in room K-354, CGIS-Knafel
(1737 Cambridge St) with a light lunch. Presentations start at 1215 pm and
usually end around 130 pm. As always, all are welcome and please email me
with any questions.
Cheers
Justin Grimmer