Methodologist as Arbitrator: Five Models for Black-White Differences in
the Causal Effect of Expectations on Attainment. Professor Stephen L.
Morgan (Sociology, Cornell University)
Wednesday October 30 at noon
Center for Basic Research in the Social Sciences
34 Kirkland Street, Room 22
Lunch will be served.
Abstract:
When progress in applied research slows because opposing coalitions of
investigators privilege their favored models, methodologists can contribute
by addressing a tractable unresolved question that is relevant to all
competing positions. In this article the literature on educational
attainment is addressed broadly by focusing on alternative positions on
the need to model students' own beliefs and more narrowly by attempting to
answer a classic question that emerged in debates over the power of status
attainment approaches: Why is the relationship between educational
expectations and subsequent educational attainment weaker for blacks than
for whites? Analyzing the High School & Beyond data, five complementary
models of the causal effect of expectations on attainment are offered: a
traditional path-model, an average effects instrumental variable model, a
counterfactual analysis of bounds, a rational expectations forecasting
model, and a panel data model of updated expectations. The general
methodological goal is to demonstrate how multi-model research can be
pursued: After delineating the motivating assumptions of alternative
theoretical positions and the explanations that they sustain, one then
simultaneously estimates a wide range of plausible models, derives
alternative permissible conclusions, and specifies the implied research
program that must be mounted to choose from among the plausible
conclusions.
The paper may be accessed at:
http://www.courses.fas.harvard.edu/~gov3009/handouts/methodologistoct2002.p…
The Research Workshop in Applied Statistics is a forum for graduate
students, faculty, and visiting scholars to present and discuss
statistical innovations and applications in the social sciences. For more
information or to receive workshop announcements every week, contact
corr(a)fas.harvard.edu.
Randomness and Coincidences: Reconciling Intuition and Probability
Theory
Presentation by Tom Griffiths (Stanford University, Psychology
Department).
Coauthored by Joshua Tennenbaum (Stanford University, Psychology
Department).
Wednesday October 23 at noon
Center for Basic Research in the Social Sciences
34 Kirkland Street, Room 22
Lunch will be served.
Abstract:
People are notoriously bad at reasoning about chance. Our intuitions about
randomness and coincidences seem to be inconsistent with the normative
structure of statistics: events that are equally likely to arise by chance
differ in their subjective randomness, and we consistently underestimate
the probability of coincidences. I will argue that we can understand why
these apparent errors arise by focusing on the evidence observations
provide about the processes that generated them rather than their
probability of occurring by chance. As part of this argument, I will
present a simple Bayesian framework that gives predictions about both the
extent to which a set of events will seem random, and the strength of
coincidences. This framework accurately predicts behavior in a variety of
contexts, suggesting that statistics might yet contribute to understanding
our intuitions about chance.
The Research Workshop in Applied Statistics is a forum for graduate
students, faculty, and visiting scholars to present and discuss
statistical innovations and applications in the social sciences. For more
information, contact corr(a)fas.harvard.edu.
The paper may be accessed at:
http://www-psych.stanford.edu/~gruffydd/papers/random.pdf
The presenter's email is:
gruffydd(a)psych.stanford.edu
"Geography, Power, and the Size of Nations: An Agent-Based Model of the
International System"
Presentation by Anders Corr (Harvard University, Government Department)
Wednesday October 16 at noon
Center for Basic Research in the Social Sciences
34 Kirkland Street, Room 22
Lunch will be served.
The Research Workshop in Applied Statistics is a forum for graduate
students, faculty, and visiting scholars to present and discuss
statistical innovations and applications in the social sciences. For more
information, contact corr(a)fas.harvard.edu.
Abstract:
Power discrepancy is an observed characteristic of the international
system. Lars-Erik Cederman's agent-based computer model, GeoSim, simulates
the interaction of states in an international system, but produces
equilibria in which power is distributed homogenously over system members
(Cederman 2002). Alesina and Spolaore (forthcoming) likewise model changes
in the size of nations without accounting for equilibria in which small
and large states coexist. This study enriches Cederman's model by adding
geography, thereby supplying a missing link in both literatures. As
expected, geography yields a long-run distribution of power consistent
with the empirical discrepancy between states, including the simultaneous
existence of small and hegemonic polities.
The paper may be accessed at:
http://www.courses.fas.harvard.edu/~gov3009/handouts/geosimgeog8.pdf
``Estimation of Optimal Treatment or Sequential Decision Strategies from
Non-Experimental Data Using Structural Nested Models"
Presentation by Professor James Robins (Harvard University, School of
Public Health)
Wednesday October 9 at noon
Center for Basic Research in the Social Sciences
34 Kirkland Street, Room 22
Lunch will be served.
The Research Workshop in Applied Statistics is a forum for graduate
students, faculty, and visiting scholars to present and discuss
statistical innovations and applications in the social sciences. For more
information, contact corr(a)fas.harvard.edu.
This week's paper is not available prior to the presentation.