Hi there,
We hope you will join us this Wednesday, April 28th at the Applied
Statistics workshop when we will be happy to have Daniel Sorensen from
University of Aarhus. Details and an abstract are below. A light lunch
will be served. Thanks!
"Modelling components of variation: is environmental variance of
quantitative traits genetically controlled?"
Daniel Sorensen
University of Aarhus
April 28th, 2010, 12 noon
K354 CGIS Knafel (1737 Cambridge St)
Abstract:
The classical model of quantitative genetics assumes that
genotypes affect phenotypic values and means but that the variance of
phenotype, given genotype (environmental variance) is the same for all
genotypes. An extension (HET) postulates that both mean and
variability differ between genotypes. Over recent years, statistical
support for a genetic component at the level of the environmental
variance has come from fitting the HET model to field or experimental
data in various species. Since the skewness of the marginal
distribution of the data under the HET model is directly proportional
to the coefficient of correlation between genes affecting mean and
variance, there is the concern that statistical support for the HET
model may be an artifact of the scale of measurement. One may pose the
question: Is there still support for the HET model when the data are
analyzed in the “correct”scale? Here this was investigated by
extending the HET model to accommodate the family of Box-Cox
transformations. Litter size data in rabbits and pigs that had
previously been analyzed in the untransformed scale were reanalyzed in
a scale equal to the mode of the marginal posterior distribution of
the Box-Cox parameter. In the rabbit data, the statistical evidence
for a genetic component at the level of the environmental variance is
considerably weaker than that resulting from an analysis in the
original metric. In the pig data, the statistical evidence is
stronger, but the coefficient of correlation between additive genetic
effects affecting mean and variance changes sign, compared to the
results in the untransformed scale. The study confirms that inferences
on variances can be strongly affected by the presence of asymmetry in
the distribution of the data. We recommend that to avoid one important
source of spurious inferences, future work seeking support for a
genetic component acting on environmental variation using a parametric
approach based on normality assumptions, confirms that these are met.
Cheers,
matt.
Hi there,
We hope you will join us this Wednesday, April 21st at the Applied
Statistics workshop when we will be happy to have Marco Caliendo who
is visiting IQSS from IZA - Institute for the Study of Labor. Details
and an abstract are below. A light lunch will be served. Thanks!
"Locus of Control and Job Search Strategies"
Marco Caliendo
IZA - Institute for the Study of Labor
April 21st, 2010, 12 noon
K354 CGIS Knafel (1737 Cambridge St)
Abstract:
Standard job search theory assumes that unemployed individuals have
perfect information about the effect of their search effort on the job
offer arrival rate. In this paper, we present an alternative model
which assumes instead that each individual has a subjective belief
about the impact of his or her search effort on the rate at which job
offers arrive. These beliefs depend in part on an individual's locus
of control, i.e., the extent to which a person believes that future
outcomes are determined by his or her own actions as opposed to
external factors. We estimate the impact of locus of control on job
search behavior using a novel panel data set of newly-unemployed
individuals in Germany. Consistent with our theoretical predictions,
we find evidence that individuals with an internal locus of control
search more and that individuals who believe that their future
outcomes are determined by external factors have lower reservation
wages.
Cheers,
matt.
Hello,
We hope you will join us this Wednesday, April 14th at the Applied
Statistics workshop when we will be happy to have Arthur Spirling from
the Department of Government. Details and an abstract are below. A
light lunch will be served. Thanks!
"Power and Polity: A New Look at Democratic Effectiveness" (with
Jonathan Renshon)
Arthur Spirling
Government Department
April 14th, 2010, 12 noon
K354 CGIS Knafel (1737 Cambridge St)
Abstract:
We consider the link between democracy and war outcomes, which has
been the subject of lively and long-standing debate. We contend that
prior work has been hampered by data choice, research design and
statistical approach. Building on previous efforts, we introduce a
newly extended Bradley-Terry (BT) model that is well-suited for the
question at hand: what factors help states win wars and militarized
disputes? In addition to the methodological innovations detailed here,
we present important new substantive findings that clarify and extend
our understanding of the link between regime type and military
effectiveness. Our approach allows more precision as regards the
effects of democracy in waging and winning wars. We identify a number
of other factors that significantly impact the odds of victory (e.g.
the 'initiation effect'). Subsequently, we use the MID dataset to
extend the scope of investigation and show that democracies are more
likely than other regime types to prevail in disputes that fall short
of war. In doing so, we demonstrate that the 'democratic advantage'
operates in conflicts at every level of intensity and not in
high-stakes wars alone, as previously believed.
A copy of the paper is available upon request from Arthur:
aspirling(a)gov.harvard.edu
Cheers,
matt.
Hello,
We hope you will join us next Wednesday, April 7th at the Applied
Statistics workshop when we will be happy to have Thomas Kane from the
Graduate School of Education and currently at the Gates Foundation.
Details, abstract and a link to the paper are below. In addition,
Thomas asked that I include a link to a contrasting paper that comes
to a different conclusion than his own. Part of the talk will be about
the reconciliation of these two lines of research. A light lunch will
be served. Thanks!
"Estimating Teacher Impacts on Student Achievement: An Experimental Approach"
Thomas J. Kane
Graduate School of Education
April 7th, 2010, 12 noon
K354 CGIS Knafel (1737 Cambridge St)
Abstract:
We used a random-assignment experiment in Los Angeles Unified School
District to evaluate various non-experimental methods for estimating
teacher effects on student test scores. Having estimated teacher
effects during a pre-experimental period, we used these estimates to
predict student achievement following random assignment of teachers
to classrooms. While all of the teacher effect estimates we considered
were significant predictors of student achievement under random
assignment, those that controlled for prior student test scores
yielded unbiased predictions and those that further controlled for
mean classroom characteristics yielded the best prediction accuracy.
In both the experimental and non-experimental data, we found that
teacher effects faded out by roughly 50 percent per year in the two
years following teacher assignment.
Thomas's paper:
http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic646669.files/kane%20and%20staige…
Rothenstein paper:
http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic646669.files/rothstein_teacher_e…
Cheers,
matt.
~~~~~~~~~~~
Matthew Blackwell
PhD Candidate
Institute for Quantitative Social Science
Department of Government
Harvard University
email: mblackwell(a)iq.harvard.edu
url: http://people.fas.harvard.edu/~blackwel/